Note-taking methods: 5 that work and how to choose

Where these methods come from

The best known, the Cornell method, was developed in the 1950s by Walter Pauk, who ran Cornell University’s reading and study center. He spread it through How to Study in College, first published by Houghton Mifflin in 1962. Cornell’s alumni magazine notes the book is still in print in an 11th edition, co-written with Ross J. Q. Owens.

The other four have no single inventor. University learning centers tend to teach them as a set: Rutgers, for example, lists Cornell, outline, mapping, charting and sentence methods side by side. The term mind map comes from Tony Buzan, who introduced it in his 1974 BBC series Use Your Head.

A word on “learning styles”. Plenty of guides tell “visual learners” to mind-map and “auditory learners” to record. In 2008, Harold Pashler and colleagues reviewed that idea for Psychological Science in the Public Interest and found virtually no evidence that matching instruction to a person’s preferred style improves results. Choose by content, not by label.

The five methods, one by one

1. Cornell. Split the page into three areas: a wide notes column on the right (Pauk’s layout uses about 6 inches), a cue column on the left (about 2.5 inches) and a summary strip at the bottom. During the session, write on the right. Afterwards, add questions or keywords on the left and a two- or three-sentence summary at the bottom. To review, cover the right column and answer the left-hand questions out loud. Best for anything you’ll need to reproduce: a lecture, a training course, a book.

2. Outline. Headings, subheadings and indented points: 1, 1.1, 1.2, then 2. Easy to review and it shows how ideas rank. It assumes the speaker is organized; when they jump around, your outline turns to spaghetti.

3. Mapping. Topic in the center, main ideas as branches, details as sub-branches. It shows connections and fits on one page. Great for planning a project, a talk or a house move; harder to keep up with live when the pace is fast and you run out of room.

4. Charting. Columns decided in advance (say option, price, pros, cons) and one row per item. Perfect for comparing three contractor quotes, phone plans or historical periods. You need to know the categories before you start.

5. Sentence. One idea per line, as a short numbered sentence. The fallback when things move fast and no structure is visible: a debate, a busy meeting, a doctor’s appointment full of instructions. The downside is that major and minor points blur together, so you’ll need to tidy up afterwards.

What the research says

Psychologists have long separated two functions of notes. Kenneth Kiewra summed them up in Educational Psychologist in 1985: taking notes helps in itself, because you process information as you write it, and reviewing them adds a further benefit.

The first effect is real but modest. In 2005, Kobayashi pooled 57 studies comparing note-takers with people who only listened and found a small-to-medium average effect (d = 0.22). In a second meta-analysis (2006, 33 studies), he found the effects were “substantial” when note-taking was combined with review.

So how should you review? In 2011, Jeffrey Karpicke and Janell Blunt compared two study activities in 80 students, with study time matched: building a concept map, or free recall (writing down everything you remember, rereading, and recalling again). A week later, the recall group scored 67% against 45% for the concept-map group. Mapping wasn’t useless; it beat a single read-through. Testing yourself was simply better.

Two caveats. First, your own notes are usually incomplete: Kiewra showed back in 1985 that students who also reviewed the instructor’s notes did better. Second, verbatim notes aren’t always bad. Across three experiments published in 2013, Bui, Myerson and Hale found that transcribing a lecture on a computer, followed by time to study those notes, produced better delayed recall than organized notes did. Review changes the picture.

What about pen versus laptop? We covered that debate, from Mueller and Oppenheimer to the 2024 meta-analysis by Flanigan and colleagues, in our weekly planner guide. The short version: handwriting’s edge is small, and it grows when you review your notes.

A Cornell template to copy

Copy this onto a notebook page or paste it into your notes app. Write the left-hand questions after the session, ideally the same day.

Topic: ______________________   Date: ____/____/______
Source: lecture / meeting / book / appointment

+-------------------+-------------------------------------------+
| CUES / QUESTIONS  | NOTES (during the session)                |
| (after)           |                                           |
|                   | - one idea per line                       |
| What?             | - abbreviations: e.g., cf., vs, approx.   |
| Why?              | - exact numbers and names                 |
| Who does what?    | - leave a blank line between blocks       |
|                   |                                           |
+-------------------+-------------------------------------------+
| SUMMARY (2-3 sentences, written from memory):                 |
|                                                               |
| ACTIONS: what / who / by when                                 |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+

Review: cover the right column and answer the cues out loud.
Repeat the next day, then a week later.

Meeting notes and life notes

Most note-taking advice is aimed at students. Yet you take notes all week: at the doctor’s, with a mortgage adviser, at a parent-teacher meeting, on hold with customer service. The goal here isn’t to study. It’s to drop nothing.

Three rules cover most of it:

1. Start with context. Date, who was there, topic: “March 12, Dr. Patel, blood pressure follow-up.” Without it, the note is useless six months later.
2. Separate facts from actions. Capture information as it comes (sentence method), then finish with an “Actions” block: what, who, by when. An action without an owner and a date is a wish.
3. Move actions out within two hours. A deadline buried in a closed notebook stays buried. Turn it into a dated reminder or an item on your to-do list. Reference numbers, policy numbers and shoe sizes belong somewhere you can find them again, as our second brain guide explains.

For a team meeting, the last minute is the most valuable: read the actions aloud and have each owner confirm. Then send only that block to everyone, not your full notes.

A 10-minute review routine

Notes you never reopen are wasted effort. A short routine tied to a fixed moment is enough.

1. Same evening (5 min). Fill gaps while it’s fresh, write questions in the margin and a two-sentence summary.
2. Right after (2 min). Pull out actions: each deadline becomes a dated reminder, each practical fact goes into your memory system.
3. Next day (3 min). Cover the notes and answer the margin questions. Mark what you missed.
4. One week later. Same exercise on the missed questions only. For an exam, repeat before the test.

Passes 3 and 4 apply the free-recall practice tested by Karpicke and Blunt: quiz yourself instead of rereading.

With Binome360: life notes that need to resurface

Binome360 doesn’t replace your lecture notebook or notes app. It handles what must come back at the right moment: practical facts and actions. You type or say one sentence, your assistant prepares the record, and nothing is saved until you confirm. “Remember that…” keeps a fact in your memory; “remind me…” prepares a reminder; you can attach a file, such as a photo of the meeting notes.

Frequently asked questions

What is the most effective note-taking method?

No single method wins. Cornell has the edge of building active review into the page (cues and summary), which matches what the research supports best. For comparisons, charting is clearer; for fast, messy discussions, short sentences are safer.

How do I take notes faster?

Write ideas, not full sentences, and adopt a fixed set of about ten abbreviations (e.g., cf., vs, approx., w/, w/o). Leave blank space between blocks so you can fill in later. Don’t hunt for structure while listening; add it that evening.

Do mind maps actually work?

They help, especially for seeing how ideas connect. Nesbit and Adesope’s 2006 meta-analysis (55 studies, 5,818 participants) linked concept maps to better retention, with effects that varied widely. But in Karpicke and Blunt’s experiment, recalling from memory beat building a map for the same study time.

Should I rewrite my notes neatly?

Copying them out word for word takes time for little gain. Rewriting by rephrasing, turning points into questions or summarizing from memory is more useful, because it makes your memory do the work.

In short

Choose the method by the material: outline or Cornell for structured content, a chart for comparisons, sentences for anything fast. The real payoff comes afterwards: write questions, quiz yourself from memory, and turn every action into a dated reminder.

First step: at your next meeting or class, draw the Cornell cue column and summary strip, and fill them in that same evening.

Sources

• Walter Pauk, How to Study in College, Houghton Mifflin, 1962 (1st edition); later editions with Ross J. Q. Owens.
• Cornell University, “Take Note: Popular Study Method has ‘Cornell’ Written All Over It”, Cornellians: alumni.cornell.edu/cornellians/cornell-notes.
• Cornell University Learning Strategies Center, “The Cornell Note Taking System”: lsc.cornell.edu.
• University of Cincinnati Learning Commons, “The Cornell Method for Note-Taking” (column dimensions): uc.edu.
• Rutgers Learning Centers, “Note Taking Systems”, 2013: learningcenters.rutgers.edu.
• Tony Buzan, Use Your Head, BBC, 1974 (TV series and book).
• Harold Pashler, Mark McDaniel, Doug Rohrer and Robert Bjork, “Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence”, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119, 2008: doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x.
• Kenneth A. Kiewra, “Investigating Notetaking and Review: A Depth of Processing Alternative”, Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 23–32, 1985: doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2001_4.
• Kenneth A. Kiewra, “Providing the Instructor’s Notes: An Effective Addition to Student Notetaking”, Educational Psychologist, 20(1), 33–39, 1985: doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2001_5.
• K. Kobayashi, “What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(2), 242–262, 2005: doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.10.001.
• K. Kobayashi, “Combined Effects of Note-Taking/-Reviewing on Learning and the Enhancement through Interventions: A meta-analytic review”, Educational Psychology, 26(3), 459–477, 2006: doi.org/10.1080/01443410500342070.
• Jeffrey D. Karpicke and Janell R. Blunt, “Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping”, Science, 331(6018), 772–775, 2011: doi.org/10.1126/science.1199327.
• Dung C. Bui, Joel Myerson and Sandra Hale, “Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 299–309, 2013: doi.org/10.1037/a0030367.
• John C. Nesbit and Olusola O. Adesope, “Learning With Concept and Knowledge Maps: A Meta-Analysis”, Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 413–448, 2006: doi.org/10.3102/00346543076003413.
• Abraham E. Flanigan et al., “Typed Versus Handwritten Lecture Notes and College Student Achievement: A Meta-Analysis”, Educational Psychology Review, 36, 78, 2024: doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09914-w.

Also available in Français.